Village and Global Health
Are Now Inseparable
Roberto and his fellow campesinos
are relieved that in their corner of Mexico the people's
land rights have, at least for the present, been partially
preserved. They know that their right to land is crucial
to freedom from hunger which is key to health. Yet Roberto
and the Piaxtla health team also realize that their gains
are tenuous. Like many community workers, he has learned
that the biggest threats to health are now on a global
scale. The small farmers of Mexico's Sierra Madre may
for the moment have partially recovered their land rights.
But the inequities of the world economic order persist.
NAFTA remains in place, legally binding Mexico to the
corporate interests of the United States. Already many
small farmers in Mexico are being forced off their land.
With the tariffs lifted by NAFTA, the United States is
now exporting tons of surplus maize into Mexico. Subsidized
by the US government, the selling price of this maize
is half that of Mexican maize (although the buying price
for families has not dropped). Unable to compete, countless
campesinos who are giving up farming and moving
in desperation to the growing slums of the cities, are
finding that, as a result of the competitive market forces
of free trade, the prices of food staples rise faster
than wages.
Many health workers, including Roberto, are already suffering
from NAFTA. During 20 years and at considerable sacrifice,
Roberto had gradually built up a small herd of eight cattle.
The cattle were an investment, the proceeds from which
with which he planned to send his oldest son to college
and then medical school (in the hopes his son would become
one of those rare doctors who return to serve the villagers).
But now with NAFTA, the US beef industry is shipping hybrid
cattle into Mexico at wholesale prices, thus undercutting
the value of local cattle. Almost overnight the selling
price of Roberto's cattle has dropped to half of what
it was. Thus, NAFTA has slashed Roberto's life savings
and his son's dream of medical school.
Yet things could be worse. Whatever his losses, Roberto
knows he is relatively lucky. His family still has a plot
of land to plant. His children for the time being do not
go hungry. He knows that millions of families in Mexico
and throughout the world are much worse off.
While many critics predicted grim outcomes from NAFTA,
few foresaw the plummeting of the peso, starting in December,
1994, which has suddenly converted Mexico from the success
story of trade liberalization into a global economic basket
case. To keep the wolf from the door (and foreign investors
from losing vast sums) Mexico has already borrowed billions
of dollars from the US government, the World Bank, and
the IMF, and has a line of credit for billions more. Even
if the peso can be kept from slipping further--and so
far there is no certainty of this--the burden of repaying
the debt, along with the hardships of the devaluation
itself, have fallen largely on the backs of the poor,
whose real wages continue to plunge.
To keep servicing its increasing debt, Mexico has had
to escalate the austerity measures already demanded by
the World Bank's structural adjustment programs (see Chapter
11). Already, the Mexican people have suffered further
reductions in public services, further declines in real
wages, increased taxation, and more user fees for health,
education and other social services. By mid-1995 the price
of oil had risen 35% and a federal sales tax on most goods
had been raised from 10% to 15%.
Mexico provides a stark example of the global trend we
examined in Part 3 of this book. With NAFTA and other
free market strategies designed to favor the privileged,
the plight of the poor is worsening in both poor countries
and rich. In 1991 Mexico had only 2 billionaires. Today
it has 28. Reportedly, one of these billionaires, Carlos
Slim, controls as much wealth as 17 million of his poor
compatriots.
Internationally there has been much high-level discussion
about Universal Human Rights: the Rights of Children,
the Rights of Women, the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,
etc. But the New World Order--spearheaded by the international
financial institutions (the World Bank and the IMF)--has
denied humanity the most fundamental rights of all: the
right to have enough to eat and, ultimately, the right
to live.